Three variants of the subject organizationof personality are described: mono-personality, binary personality, and ternary personality. The empirical researchshows that in the process of solving such problems each of the inner subjects included in the personality(Autocratic I, With One Other, I Myself, and Capable I) reaches a compliance of theindividual’s ambitions and the acquired possibilities. From this point of view we have considered somemanifestations of an individual’s self-regulation (taking such forms as volitional, semantic, target-oriented, and operational) when solving a problem to one’s taste. Vygotsky) ahypothetical attempt is made to describe the structure of an individual’s personality as a resultof interiorization of various subject assemblies. In accordancewith the law of development of higher mental functions (according to L. There are some numerical examples given illustratingthe effect of achieving the Possibleness optimum in various forms of subject assemblies. There are several models of subject assemblies: self-employed farmer, author - expert,leader - partners, and master - worker. An obvious consequence of accepting the Possibleness model is the transition to multi-subject models of personality: they allow to realizethe Possibleness optimum conditions in those cases when the one-to-one with the world interactionimpedes revealing of subjectness (limited resources of the environment, lack or surplus ofdesires). In this context, subjectness is definedas the Possibleness that meets the optimum criteria (“Get your investments repaid”, “Be efficient”,“Save up”, “Do not skimp on efforts”). Possibleness is an experienced feasibility of possibilities.There are conditions of the Possibleness optimum that are based on the mathematical model ofPossibleness combining ideas of the variety of possibilities.
The followingis accepted: the higher the level of obvious (manifested) possibilities (I can), the stronger theurge to implement them (I want) (thus not only I want causes I can, but I can challenges I want).The dynamic unity of I can and I want forms the essence of what the author determines asPossibleness of an individual we mean the possibilities that an individual does not only have butexperiences them as existing in him. There are various possibilities, internal and external, obvious and hidden,newly acquired and actualized, opportunities of support and opportunities of desire. Heidegger) in the process of an individual’s interaction with environment.They not only contribute to achieving of any other purposes, but they themselves form the goalsguiding the activity. In the meantime it is postulated that the total amount of potential possibilitiesof an individual is unlimited (the metaphor of an infinite-dimensional cube is taken). This way subjectnessis determined as the art of dealing with own current possibilities, thus ensuring their extensivereproduction.
The criterion of subjectness is the correspondence between the opportunities investedin the process, and the opportunities accumulated in the process of achieving. Being the Subject means to produce possibilities ofachieving.
The Subject is not the one who has achieved butthe one who does everything to achieve. The author understands the subject in general as the cause of oneself and determines the subjectnessof an individual as their ability to be both the source and the result of their own activities.In the present work, the author answers the following question: What is the subject of reproductionin an individual? In comparison with an earlier interpretation of subjectness, the scope ofrevealed causa sui is specified: possibilities of an individual are discerned which are implementedand acquired by them in the process of activity.
0 kommentar(er)
